Judging Rubric
So that you have a better understanding of the criteria the judges will use while reviewing each project, below is a copy of the judging rubric and scale.
IIDA Alabama's IDIE Awards Judging Rubric
| Project Concept & Scope Points Possible: 1-10 | Is the overlying design concept described? Does the description set the scene for the supporting documents? Is the project scope well defined and describes the submitting firm's role on the project? Are the project requirements described? Is the design concept supportive of the project requirements? |
| Effective Use of Space Points Possible: 1-10 | Is the space well planned? Is it ADA accessible? Is the design concept evident in the plans? Is the solution functional and does it appear to meet user needs? Are the existing conditions of the site considered and incorporated into the final design successfully? |
| Design of Space Points Possible: 1-10 | Are the walls, floors, and ceilings utilized as planes of expression that support the overall organizational plan and design concept? Are the RCP and lighting utilized as design elements (both artificial and natural) that enhance the design? Furniture Installation Exception: Is the furniture utilized to support the overall organizational plan and design concept? Do the materials and finishes enhance the design? |
| Creativity & Originality Points Possible: 1-10 | Are the ideas well established? Is the overall project interpretation original and creative? Have the project requirements been met with a creative solution? Are the elements and principles of design utilized effectively in the solution? Does the design of the project generate new knowledge in the field of interior design? |
| Presentation Points Possible: 1-10 | Is the overall graphic and visual presentation supportive of the written material and easy for the judges to follow? Do the photograph views support the design? Is the presentation well executed and professionally appropriate? Did the submitting firm follow instructions? |
IIDA Alabama's IDIE Awards Scale
| Rating 1 Below Standard | The design falls short of expectations for this competition. Major issues in execution or concept, lacks sophistication or coherence. |
| Rating 2 Weak | A design that shows effort but is not up to par. Noticeable deficiencies in creativity, functionality, or overall impact. |
| Rating 3 Acceptable | The design is functional and meets minimum standards but lacks distinction. Limited creativity or execution issues detract from its success. |
| Rating 4 Fair | A respectable design with some strong points but not particularly remarkable. Concept and execution are average but competent. |
| Rating 5 Good | A solid design that demonstrates thoughtfulness and skill. Meets expectations for the competition, with room for improvement in some areas. |
| Rating 6 Very Good | A well-executed and cohesive design. Strong creativity and functionality, with minor flaws or opportunities for enhancement. |
| Rating 7 Excellent | A standout design that shows originality, exceptional execution, and careful attention to detail. Few flaws and clearly above average. |
| Rating 8 Superior | A highly creative, polished, and innovative design. Thoughtfully executed with clear expertise and vision, leaving a strong impression. |
| Rating 9 Exceptional | A design that excels in all key aspects - creativity, functionality, and execution. Memorable and impactful with no significant flaws. |
| Rating 10 Extraordinary | Flawless design that exceeds even the highest expectations. An inspiring and groundbreaking achievement that sets a benchmark for excellence. |
Maximum points that can be awarded per project: 50